Verstappen again claims he “can’t be critical” after penalty for colliding with Russell

Formula 1

Posted on

| Written by

Max Verstappen repeated his claim he is not allowed to be critical of stewarding decisions after being penalised in the Spanish Grand Prix.

The stewards handed the Red Bull driver a 10-second time penalty for colliding with George Russell during today’s race.

Verstappen’s Red Bull team had erroneously advised him to let Russell past after the pair clashed at turn one earlier in the race. However after Verstappen backed off to allow Russell alongside him at turn five, he ran wide and collided with the Mercedes.

Russell accused his rival of deliberately causing the collision. However Verstappen refused to discuss the incident.

“I don’t need to say anything about it,” he told the official F1 channel. “It doesn’t matter anyway, we can’t be critical about anything.”

Verstappen gave the same reason when he refused to discuss another penalty after the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix. At the time this was seen as a reference to new rules regarding driver conduct introduced by the FIA. However the sport’s governing body has revised and softened those rules since then.

He endured a difficult end to the race after the Safety Car was deployed with 11 laps to go. While other drivers switched to soft tyres, Verstappen’s most suitable rubber was the hard compound.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

He almost lost control at the final corner after the restart and was passed by Charles Leclerc, then came under attack from Russell.

“I had a big moment there in the last corner,” he said. “Unfortunately, the hard tyres had very low grip, so that was quite painful.

“But basically we’d just run out of tyres. I mean, in hindsight, was it better to [not pit]? Maybe, I don’t know. It’s always easy to say afterwards. But because of those hard tyres you get into those situations.”

Penalty box

Did the stewards issue the correct penalty for Verstappen’s clash with Russell at turn five? Cast your vote below and have your say in the comments.

Verstappen's penalty for colliding with Russell was:

  • No opinion (0%)
  • Far too lenient (65%)
  • Slightly too lenient (18%)
  • Correct (13%)
  • Slightly too harsh (2%)
  • Far too harsh (2%)

Total Voters: 257

Loading ... Loading ...

A RaceFans account is required in order to vote. If you do not have one, register an account here or read more about registering here. When this poll is closed the result will be displayed instead of the voting form.

Miss nothing from RaceFans

Get a daily email with all our latest stories - and nothing else. No marketing, no ads. Sign up here:

Please check your junk email folder to ensure you receive our emails

2025 Spanish Grand Prix

Browse all 2025 Spanish Grand Prix articles

Author information

Keith Collantine
Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 - when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

51 comments on “Verstappen again claims he “can’t be critical” after penalty for colliding with Russell”

  1. Yes (@come-on-kubica)
    1st June 2025, 19:00

    Probably need to take responsibility and stop being a child. He’s been way too overpamered in F1. Imagine if this was Schumacher.

    1. Dont have to imagine, he was just as bad, if not worse

      1. Schumacher was the original icon of unsporty behaviour, Verstappen is merely following his lead.

    2. was the move on George intentional?
      Max: Does it matter?

      does anything matter to Max other than win at all cost, pass on at all cost or prevent any overtake at all cost… he doesnt give a dam about any collusion with anyone, he had great relationship with lando who was probably his only friend in the whole field, he burned that bridge too… Even Lando in the first corner let him through thinking of WDC rather than messing with a petulantly man child

      1. @mysticus – That two completely different things. I actually respect the “win at all costs” mentality of Max even when it leads to him bending the rules. That’s what F1 has always been for me… Most champions have taken a similar mentality (even if Max is more extreme with it).

        What he did today had nothing to do with winning. It had nothing to do with motorsport… He could have just kept the position and argued his case afterwards or he could have let Russell by just before the DRS line and tried to regain the position. It’s like comparing a footballer hand-balling the ball into the net and a footballer punching someone… There’s no advantage to be gained – he just lost his head.

      2. @mysticus I think he said Later that it was a error from his side.

        Too me it looked he let George pass but wanted be as close to him as possible but his grip steering wasn’t there while the rears were. And he was to the left of that corner which is all most 180 turn.

    3. Schumacher’s move on Villeneuve at Jerez in 1997 also got a penalty as I recall.

      1. They docked all of Schumacher’s points for the season. Which was irrelevant as he had already lost the WDC

  2. BLS (@brightlampshade)
    1st June 2025, 19:12

    It’s frustrating that a driver so great has the mindset of an 8 year old.

    1. Well I mean look at his father. Case closed.

    2. Couldn’t agree anymore. This season he put himself firmly in the GOAT debate, but its impossible to support a driver with such a childish and unsportsman like behaviour. His arrogance and sense of entitlement is the only thing that surpasses his talent.
      His father may have created a heck of a driver, but it was asking too much of Jos to make a half decent human being.

  3. “we can’t be critical about anything”
    I am actually pretty sure drivers are still allowed to be critical about themselves, and it was a good occasion to exercise that right.

    1. If he were capable of such self reflection, he wouldn’t do the things that he does.

      We’ve all had moments of red mist and have snapped, but most of us realize afterwards that we screwed up and overreacted. We simply let our emotions get the better of us at that moment, but Max is incapable thinking this way. It’s actually quite sad. What must his personal life actually be like.

    2. @palindnilap according the rules No even yourself ….. But I think he wanted to say about being forced to give the place back by the RC (which never happened and wouldn’t but Red Bull & Max didn’t knew that)

  4. Imagine how good he could be if he had the intelligence to learn from his mistakes…

    1. He does learn from race craft errors.. he just can’t learn from temparament mistakes. In his mind, he does nothing wrong. If you have Horner and Marko blowing smoke up your rear end and a father like Jos, what else would you expect?

  5. This side of Max is so frustrating, even more so because up to there he was faultless – he was basically right about Leclerc even if it was very 50/50, he was right about George into T1 and IMO should never have been asked to give the place back – I don’t think George was expecting it either, but to act like that – even when angry, that’s just not good enough. Just ignore the call to give the place back and argue later if you’re not happy about it.

  6. Verstappen’s Red Bull team had erroneously advised him to let Russell past after the pair clashed at turn one earlier in the race.

    Erroneously? Why was it an error to ask him to let Russell by?

      1. That’s just bad by red bull, I also thought he was in the right, he was convinced it was wrong to let russell by and should’ve sticked to his convinction, they really ruined his race by letting russell by.

        1. letting RUS by would have cost one place. He ruined it himself, first with a driving mistake at the restart, then with on purpose crashing into RUS

  7. I wonder if he’d act differently if he was at a different team.

    Have Red Bull enabled this version of Max or is it just down to him and something that’s hardwired in?

    I’m pretty certain that Zak, Toto or one of the other more established Team Principals would call out behaviour like this.

    1. I said this in a different article. Redbull/Max as a team needs a complete reset. From drivers to CEO.

      They need to go to different teams …explore and re-invent themselves as individuals.

    2. @sonnycrockett I am sure that Red Bull has been part of the enablement.

      1. 1,000,000%

        No other CEO would tolerate this

    3. Not just Red Bull, but Marko especially.

      I hate to blame the parents, but look at the dad…

  8. As someone who has been a Max fan for several years – that was far, far too lenient. That wasn’t a mistake or someone being too aggressive or too reckless… That was a deliberate crash because he was angry. That should be an immediate black flag and a 1 race ban.

    1. Exaggerated, it didn’t even damage the cars in a noticeable way, far too harsh.

      1. You must be a scary driver. He intentionally hit another car. He should’ve been shown the black flag.

    2. Sorry but IF he wanted George wouldn’t drive any further anymore. To me it looked he wanted to let George by but keep just near him to overtake him later. But with the hards his front couldn’t matched his idea while he rears could.

  9. If this was the first incident of its kind from Max, I’d say it was about right. Given he has an extraordinary history of causing incidents, and the recent example of deliberately driving Norris off the road in Mexico last year, I reckon this was far too lenient. I fear the day he does this in a high speed corner. We all know that day is coming.

    1. Silverstone 2021 type of ‘accident’ you mean? Not Max his style.

  10. Max is a very, very naughty boy and should be sent to bed without any supper.

    1. It was an entirely unacceptable move by Max, but come on, lets not get carried away.

    2. Or left at a gas station

  11. The whole situation stinks. Do 8 agree with the 10s and 3 penalty points. Yes, it may even be a mild punishment for a completely stupid action by Max.

    But Leclerc gets to hit Max on a straight and it’s not even looked at?

    Russell dives into a gap that makes an overtake 100% impossible AND he loses control of the car and touches Max’s car And shove Max off track and …. Of course not even investigated…

    This reeks of foul play and bias against Max and RedBull

    1. well that’s wrong on both counts – both WERE looked at and both were deemed not punishment required.

    2. Leclerc was investigated but didn’t get a penalty. He was ahead and on a straight the lead car is to an extent allowed to squeeze the the car behind. Verstappen also did squeeze Leclerc to the right only half a second earlier. The main difference was that Leclerc did move to the right and Verstappen refused to move left.

      Russell vs. Verstappen into turn 1 was also investigated and Russell was deemed responsible for bumping into Verstappen. But no damage was done, Verstappen kept (rightfully) his place by going through the runoff, so there was absolutely no point in punishing Russell.
      I don’t see any bias against Verstappen at all. On the contrary 10 seconds are actually pretty lenient as you said. It just went away from him with a difficult tire, the mistake, being passed, bumped into and erroneously demanded to give up the position. He just cracked and lost it, it’s human, but not an excuse for a potentially very dangerous foul.

      1. The bumping by LeClerc is the dangerous move. While ridiculous, the move Max did wasn’t.

        1. I don’t agree that the move wasn’t dangerous. The drivers (not only Verstappen) are getting too used to bumping wheels these days because the cars are so strong. But it was quite a hefty whack and it’s not beyond the realms of possibilities that it could damage Russell’s tyre or suspension causing them to break under load in one of the three super high-speed right hand corners later in the lap sending Russell straight into the barriers.

    3. You forgot to include the subpar breakfast that Max was served, and the mediocre night sleep that he bad before. All of these things add up to Max being mostly justified for his deliberate crash.

      I love how Max’s defenders cannot help themselves but make excuses for his unacceptable actions. Even if Leclerc and Russell had rammed him off the road, there is NO justification for what Max did. Would George have been justified in crashing into Max intentionally afterwards? Of course not.

    4. Woody @mysticarl was right Max wouldn’t even needed to give his position back according the Stewards.

  12. I also wouldn’t be critical of the judge who let me get away with murder.

  13. I thought the punishment was too lenient even before the ‘does it matter’ comment. I also try to take into account his ‘somewhat’ understandable state of mind when he made that comment, but I still believe it compounds the problem.

    It’s this type of attitude that made me dislike Max in his early days, and although I had admittedly warmed ‘slightly’ to him over time – he is undeniably an incredible driver – I am now half hoping he never wins another championship. I am put in mind of the old proverb “With great power comes great responsibility”.

    1. I found the penaulty 1 point too much but hell let keep making things up

  14. Sorry for the second post here, but one other thing comes to mind from the aftermath of that race.

    I find myself a little torn between respecting the drivers for avoiding any inflammatory comments regarding the incident that, given the limited chance they had to assess the event, would clearly be subjective and potentially controversial. And the slightly over sanitised and PC situation we are presented with as the alternative.

    I think I would welcome a compromise whereby the drivers voiced there opinion, but perhaps the interviewers could help caveat the views by forming questions that ensure the responses are not necessarily binding or irrevocable.

    It’s probably my rose tinted glasses, but I feel that ‘in the old days (sigh)’ it was aften difficult to prevent drivers from contributing their 2 cents.

  15. The end of that race was wild from Red Bull. Did every single person on the team lose their minds? From the hard tires, to Verstappen losing his mind because he hit Leclerc, to Red Bull not understanding the rules and telling him to give the position to Russell even though they never do that and it was maybe the first time Verstappen wasn’t at fault, to Verstappen finishing it all with the Mario Cart ram. Never seen such a complete bizarre collapse of an entire team like that.

  16. Honesty, who does he think he’s fooling with that claim that has zero foundation since no one is literally forbidden from doing so in the first place?
    He should just be fully honest about his clear-cut deliberate act instead of totally not bothering to take any accountability for his actions over & over again, which does absolutely zero service for him, his team, or even family, for that matter.

    1. @jerejj Do you know what he wanted to say …….. at that moment he wanted to curse RC for having letting George by.
      Later when things were clear he said he maded a error and didn’t want to comment it further as it does nothing (for him)
      That is the way of the Dutch zand erover en verder … (cover with sand and continue)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. See the Comment Policy and FAQ for more.
If the person you're replying to is a registered user you can notify them of your reply using '@username'.